As departures from God's Word are
considered, we ask the question: From whence did the departures of
"original sin" and "infant baptism" come? When did
they arise? "A departure from the divine government in one thing
opens the way for other departures ...Prominent among the early
departures from the divine order was the substitution of infant baptism
for that of believers. This practice originated in the third century,
and grew out of the doctrine of original sin. It was contended that
baptism was regeneration in the sense of washing away original sin; that
infants were depraved by original sin...therefore they baptized
infants..." (The Church, the Falling Away, and the Restoration,
p. 59); "...the doctrine of corruption and guilt, cleaving to human
nature in consequence of the first transgression...became more firmly
established;...the theory was finally evolved of the unconditional
necessity of infant baptism. About the middle of the third century this
theory was already generally admitted in the North African Church"
(Church History, Vol. I, pages 426,427). If you have been
following these studies on departures, you have noticed that centuries
had passed from the time of the founding of the Lord's church till the
departures became firmly fixed. To briefly recap the time frame of some
of these: Later than the second century came the departure from God's
plan for each congregation's organization (Ecclesiastical History,
Vol. I, pages 116,117). In 251 A.D., a departure in the mode of baptism,
called "clinical baptism" occurred. The first
"creed," or body of man-made rules, appears in 325 A.D. The
Nicene Creed formulated and imposed the rules agreed to by the
"chief elders," by now called "bishops." About the
middle of the third century the theory of infant baptism required
because of original sin was already generally admitted in the North
African Church. If a person or group is truly interested in the teaching
and practice of the early church, it is evident departures, which arose
centuries after the completion of the New Testament, must be discarded.
What does God say about "original sin"? Nothing! What does He say about our personal responsibility for sin? "The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him" (Ezekiel 18:20). "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law" (1 John 3:4). It is easy to see infants do not have the mental capability to read and understand God's law. They are not accountable, as are those who have reached the age at which they can read and understand God's law. In a future column, we'll look at quotes from man's creed books which teach the departures of "original sin" and "infant baptism."